Friday closed the way weeks like this usually close. SPY touched $775.30 intraday, then gave it back to finish at $769.35, down 0.23% on the day. QQQ did the same thing, off a session high to close at $716.43, down 0.65%. Both had spent most of the week climbing into Jackson Hole. Then, on the last day, the market let go of the top of the range.
I don’t read that as a signal. I read it as a level. Friday’s high is a line. Friday’s close is a line. The gap between them is the range price rejected once already. That’s all it is until price tells me more.
This coming week won’t let it stay quiet for long. Five sessions, five pieces of data, and every one of them is a rehearsal for Friday.
Tuesday: ISM Manufacturing and JOLTS
The week opens with ISM Manufacturing PMI for August and JOLTS job openings for July. I’m not going to tell you what number would be good or bad, because I don’t know, and neither does anyone posting a forecast with three decimal places of confidence. What I know is where my lines sit relative to Friday’s close. If price opens near $769 and can’t get back above $771, that’s information. If it clears $775 and holds, that’s different information. The data is the excuse. The line is the evidence.
My job Tuesday is the same as every day: mark the level, wait for price to arrive at it, watch what it does when it gets there. Nothing about ISM changes that job. It just adds a reason for volume to show up.
Wednesday: Factory Orders and ADP
Wednesday brings Factory Orders for July and ADP Employment Change for August. ADP is the one people get excited about because it lands two days before the actual jobs report and gets treated as a preview. It isn’t one, not reliably. ADP and nonfarm payrolls are built from different survey methods and different samples, and they’ve diverged from each other plenty of times — sometimes by a wide margin, sometimes in opposite directions entirely. Anyone who tells you Wednesday’s number locks in Friday’s outcome is selling a story, not reading a chart.
I’ll still be watching the reaction. Not because ADP predicts the jobs report, but because how price behaves around a headline that everyone else is trading tells me something about where the crowd’s nerves are sitting. That’s useful. The number itself, in isolation, is not something I act on.
Thursday: The Warm-Up Before the Warm-Up
Thursday is the loaded day before the loaded day. Challenger layoffs for August, the trade balance for July, the regular weekly jobless claims, and ISM Services PMI for August, all in one session. Four releases, one trading day, and Friday still sitting there afterward like the thing nobody’s actually talking about yet.
This is where discipline gets tested more than any single number does. Four data points in a day invites four reasons to abandon a level early — to decide the claims number means something, then decide the ISM Services print means something different, then flip again. I don’t trade the flips. I trade the line. If my level from Friday’s close hasn’t been touched, it isn’t relevant yet, no matter how many headlines cross between now and then.
Friday: The Jobs Report
Friday is the reason the other four days exist. The August jobs report — nonfarm payrolls and the unemployment rate — is the week’s real event, and everything from Tuesday through Thursday is a test of whether the market can hold a level ahead of it or whether it’s just drifting until the real catalyst shows up.
I’m not going to guess the number. I’m not going to tell you whether it comes in strong or weak, because that guess is worthless and I’d be lying if I pretended otherwise. What I’ll have instead is a map: Friday’s high near $775.30, Friday’s close near $769.35, and whatever new levels get carved out by Tuesday through Thursday’s reactions. When the jobs number hits and volatility spikes, price will either respect one of those lines or tear through it. Both outcomes are tradeable. Guessing which one happens in advance is not a strategy, it’s a coin flip with extra steps.
The Approach Doesn’t Change
Every one of these five days gets treated the same way. Mark the level from the last confirmed price action — right now that’s Friday’s high and Friday’s close. Let each release test that level instead of asking me to predict it. React to what price does, not to what the headline says it should do.
The temptation during a week this loaded is to have an opinion on every release. ISM will say this, ADP will say that, jobs will confirm it. I understand the appeal. It feels like preparation. Most of the time it’s just noise wearing a suit.
The line doesn’t care what I think ADP means for Friday. It only cares whether price comes back to it and what happens when it does. That’s the whole job this week, same as every week. Watching five releases doesn’t make it more complicated. It just gives the chart five more chances to prove the level right or wrong.
Join the free Static chart room →
Disclosure: that’s an affiliate link — I may earn a commission if you join a paid tier later, at no extra cost to you. The free room is free.