SPY, QQQ Stabilize Today, Durable Goods Tests Tomorrow
Both charts opened below yesterday’s close today. Both charts closed almost exactly at yesterday’s close. That’s the entire story, and I mean that literally — nothing else needs to be said about it.
What actually happened
SPY closed Tuesday at $767.81. This morning it opened at $764.07, already below that mark. From there it went lower still, printing a low of $763.24 sometime in the session. Then it turned. By the close it had round-tripped all the way back to $767.18 — 8 cents shy of Tuesday’s settled price, and sitting right up against the day’s own high of $768.95.
QQQ did the same thing on a different scale. Wednesday’s close was $741.21. Today’s open was $735.16. The low came in at $734.63 — a fresh push below the open before anything turned around. The close landed at $741.10, one penny under Wednesday, and again parked near the day’s high of $742.65.
I’m not going to tell you why. I wasn’t in the room. Nobody handed me a reason, and I don’t trust the reasons that get handed out after the fact anyway. What I have is the shape of the session, and the shape is clean: weak open, lower low, full recovery, flat close near the top of the range. That shape has a name on my chart. I call it a reclaim day.
Why the shape matters more than the number
A flat close by itself tells you nothing. Flat can mean nobody showed up. Flat can also mean a fight happened and ended in a draw. Today was the second kind. Price didn’t sit still — it got pushed down first, below where it opened, and then it got pushed all the way back. The people who sold the low did not get paid. The people who bought weakness in the first hour did.
That’s the part I mark on the chart. Not the percentage change. The low itself. $763.24 on SPY. $734.63 on QQQ. Those two prices are where sellers ran out of room today. I draw a line there and I leave it. I don’t know if it holds next week or next month. I know it held once, today, under real pressure, and that earns it a line.
I also mark the highs — $768.95 and $742.65 — because a close that parks itself against the day’s high on a round-trip session is not a lazy close. It’s a close that wanted to keep going and ran out of daylight. Whether it gets the rest of that move tomorrow, I don’t know yet. I’m not paid to know yet. I’m paid to notice where the line is.
Tomorrow is a different animal
Today had no headline attached to it that I’m willing to name. Tomorrow does. Durable Goods Orders lands at 8:30am ET, forecast at -0.3% against last month’s 1.1%. Core Durable Goods Orders comes with it, forecast 0.6% versus 0.4% previous. Ninety minutes later, at 10:00am, the revised University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment print comes in, forecast 47.4 against 47.8 prior. There are a few Fed speakers on the calendar too — Williams, Schmid, Hammack — but they’re tagged low-impact, and I have nothing to say about what any of them might say. I don’t predict speeches any more than I predict candles.
What I will say is this: a reclaim day like today, sitting right below a data dump like tomorrow’s, is exactly the setup where my lines get tested for real. Not by me guessing which way durable goods prints. By price, arriving at a level I already drew, and either respecting it or running through it.
If SPY opens tomorrow and trades back down through $763.24, that’s not a level holding — that’s a level breaking, and the reclaim story from today gets rewritten fast. Same for QQQ at $734.63. Conversely, if either name opens on the weak side of the data and finds buyers again near those same numbers, that’s two days of the same defense in a row, and that’s the kind of repetition that turns a line into something worth trusting.
What I’m actually doing tonight
I’m not writing a prediction for tomorrow’s number. I don’t have an edge on durable goods orders and I’ve never pretended to. What I have is four prices from today worth remembering: $763.24 and $768.95 on SPY, $734.63 and $742.65 on QQQ. I’ll have them drawn on a blank chart before the 8:30am print, and I’ll watch what price does when it gets there, not what the headline says it should do.
That’s the whole method. Delete the noise, keep the levels, wait for price to answer the question instead of trying to answer it for it. Some nights that feels too simple to be useful. Most nights, it’s the only thing that’s actually held up.
I used to think the useful part of a day like today was the number — the minus eight cents, the minus one cent, the fact that two of the biggest names in the market basically didn’t move. It took me a long time to stop looking there. The number is what a headline needs. The shape is what a chart needs, and only the chart tells you where to stand tomorrow morning.
So tonight I’m not asking whether durable goods orders come in at -0.3% or something else entirely. I’m asking whether $763.24 holds if price gets anywhere near it again, and whether $734.63 does the same. Those are the only two questions on my page. Everything else — the forecast, the prior reading, the sentiment revision, the Fed calendar — is context I’ll glance at once and then set down. It doesn’t move my line. Only price moving to the line moves my line.
If tomorrow opens calm and drifts, today’s range simply holds and there’s nothing new to draw. If tomorrow opens on the data and runs straight through one of these levels without pausing, that’s information too — it tells me the reclaim wasn’t strength, it was a pause before more selling, or before more buying, depending on which side breaks. I won’t know which until it happens. I’m fine with that. Not knowing yet is the job description.
That’s it. That’s the whole update. Weak open, lower low, flat close, near the highs, on both names, with a real data point sitting on the calendar tomorrow morning. I marked the levels. Now I wait.
Join the free Static chart room →
Disclosure: that’s an affiliate link — I may earn a commission if you join a paid tier later, at no extra cost to you. The free room is free.
Related reading